Analysis and Design of Concrete T-beam Girder Bridge and Box Girder Bridge a Comparative Study

Abstract

The reason for present review is the plan of Bridge structure for a few of span. The most clear decision of this span is T-Beam and Box Girder Support. They have their own particular attributes and impediments as T-Beam has simple development mythology, whereas girder and box Girder has complex and exorbitant formwork. In present review a two/four path essentially bolstered RCC T-Beam Girder Extension and Box Girder Bridge was investigations for dead load and IRC moving load. The dead load computation has been done physically and for live load straight examination is done on CSI Bridge 2016. The objective of study is to decide most positive alternative from above extension. The choices in view of clear component of designing that are security, serviceability and economy. Taking after these viewpoints a plan for T-Beam Bridge and Box Girder has been performed. After estimation two basic material utilization steel and cement the most practical has been chosen. This review is on the premise of snapshot of resistance of area, shear limit of segment and practical arrangement from both T-Beam and Box Girder Bridge Connect. T-Beam and Box Girder Bridge connect decks are one of the foremost sorts of cast set up solid decks. T-Beam connect decks comprise of a solid piece basic with supports. The limited component strategy is a general technique for basic investigation in which the arrangement of an issue in continuum mechanics is approximated by the examination of an array of limited components which are interconnected at a limited number of nodal focuses and speak to the arrangement area of the issue. A basic traverse T-Beam and Box Girder Bridge Extension was broke down by utilizing I.R.C. loadings as a one dimensional structure. A similar T-Beam and Box Girder Bridge Extension is examined as a three-dimensional structure utilizing limited component plate for the deck section and bar components for the principle bar utilizing programming CSI Bridge 2016. Both models are subjected to I.R.C. Loadings to deliver greatest twisting minute. The outcomes acquired from the limited component model are lesser than the outcomes got from one dimensional examination, which implies that the outcomes got from manual estimations subjected to IRC loadings are preservationist.